How to Manage Out-of-date Content: My comment
October 4th, 2008On the Web, nothing is more damaging to your organization’s reputation and brand than out of date content.
My comment on Giraffe Forum post dated September 27th
I would go one step further then just making sure the archived article was dated in bold; I’d put the archives on a different site altogether as this inserts an extra step in the viewing-reading process.
Yes, this could be made invisible as one page could look just like another site; however, a large banner at the top of the page or right above the article could announce ‘Archived Oct. 20, 2004.’
Abundant links could direct he reader back to main site where it is made plain that this site contains “Current info” with a date the site was updated. Archives printed out would get a header that read ‘Archived article + date published.’
Regarding some of the other points made, sites that are packed full of every kind of data can be a means of CYA (cover-your-ass)behavior.
Reviewing content for its relevancy would entail a company having a content strategy and an understanding that what’s on their site affects their customers,’ could-be customers, and-or the public’s perception of them.
Content Management Systems tend to trivialize content. While they serve as a facilitator for uploading new stuff onto the site, it gives those doing so the impression that the program is more important than the words themselves. What gets overlooked is that the content is a strategic resource of itself.
Computer programs do not provide the judgment and discretion like a content manager does.